[Double entries from CRA and Revenue Quebec sites that added up twice]

Thank you for validating the same insanity created by the Quebec government.

Since this is an issue known to Ufile, I wonder if they advised RQ so as they tweak their part of the software to make it more accurate.

[Double entries from CRA and Revenue Quebec sites that added up twice]

Thank you. I understand your approach however the problem is not only related to the RQ data but the repetition of the same data from the CRA.

I had seen the same T4 being transcribed from the CRA over to Netfile twice. This happened repeatedly over the years as you have implied.

Thanks for responding back.

[Double entries from CRA and Revenue Quebec sites that added up twice]

I am not sure if anyone experienced the issue I am about to describe. As usual, any attempt to get assistance from Ufile is totally futile. Trying to get assistance from them is like hitting a brick wall.

The best way to describe the issue I had is using an example of one T5 slip that was issued by one bank . After downloading data via autofill from the CRA and Revenue Quebec (RQ) I discovered that the same T5 appeared twice on the left pane of the return. In the first T5 (let's call it A) there appeared only the entry for the Federal. In the second T5 (let's call it B) there appeared the entry for RQ and once more, the entry for the Federal. This meant that the entry for the Federal showed double the income (the addition of A and B).

To validate the theory that the Federal entry is added twice, I compared the total income in the Review section once with both T5 (A and B) there and once again with the T5 that showed only the Federal part (A) removed. The outcome was definitely different.

Other than the T5, I had also found that some other reported slips such are T3 and T5008 had been autofilled in the same fashion, twice yet some slips were reported correctly, i.e. once.

If any one had encountered such a problem, I would appreciate any insight of their findings and what did they do to fix this issue short of not using the autofill at all.

Until this auto transfer becomes reliable I strongly suggest that users be very cautious in using this feature